I love my Osprey Sojourn convertible travel luggage. It’s been a faithful companion on many a trip. But lately I’ve decided that I want to travel lighter and go for a bag that’s carry-on-sized. After much searching I decided that the Osprey Farpoints have the feature set I was looking for: lightweight, roomy, potentially capable of being carried on, can be carried as a backpack with tuck away straps, and includes a detachable daypack.

Despite what their stock photos show, the Farpoint 70 (left) and the Farpoint 55 (right) both measure 25" (63cm) in height.
Despite what their stock photos show, the Farpoint 70 (left) and the Farpoint 55 (right) both measure 25″ (63cm) in height. ©Osprey

Initially, it seemed if I wanted to carry on the bag, then the Farpoint 55 would be my only option, but after some digging, I also saw that some folks had successfully carried on the Farpoint 70. I searched blog after blog and review after review and found lots of confusing and conflicting information on exactly how big these bags are and how they compare to each other. Even Osprey’s site had confusing information: it listed the Farpoint 55 with larger dimensions than the Farpoint 70! (They’ve since updated their website and cleared this up).

I decided the only way to really get to the bottom of this was to order both backpacks and check them out myself. If you’ve had any questions regarding these popular travel backpacks, hopefully this post will clear them up.

The Osprey Farpoint 55 (left) and the Farpoint 70 (right) with their daypacks. Empty, it's difficult to spot any difference in size between them.
The Osprey Farpoint 55 (left) and the Farpoint 70 (right) with their daypacks. Empty, it’s difficult to spot any difference in size between them.

When I first unpacked the backpacks and set them next to each other, I couldn’t notice any discernible difference. As mentioned earlier, there was lots of conflicting information about the actual dimensions of the packs. Ospreys updated website clears up the misinformation it had before. Without the daypack attached, the Farpoint 55 measures 25″ x 13″ x 12″ (64cm x 34cm x 30cm) and the Farpoint 70 measures 25″ x 14″ x 13″(64cm x 36cm x 32cm). This makes sense with how they look next to each other. They are the same height, and the extra inch on the width and depth of the Farpoint 70 isn’t noticeable unless it’s stuffed. The Farpoint 55 has a 40L main compartment and the Farpoint 70 has a 55L main compartment (the detachable daypack accounts for the other 15L for each bag).

Either Farpoint is more than capable of hauling enough clothing and gear for a two week+ adventure. The 55 is shown in the picture.
Either Farpoint is more than capable of hauling enough clothing and gear for a two week+ adventure. The 55 is shown in the picture.

The next step was to pack the bags and compare them to each other. I put together a packing list for what I might take on a two week trip, including extra shoes and a jacket to cover various climates. I used two large Eagle Creek packing cubes for shirts and pants/shorts. The Eagle Creek cubes are 14″ (35cm) in width which is perfect for both the Farpoint 55 and Farpoint 70. Other companies’ large cubes are 17″ or 18″ (43-45cm) which would require you to pack them vertically instead of horizontally, taking up more space (the tradeoff being they are able to hold more items in each cube). My socks and underwear went into the mesh pockets on the flap. I used dry sacks for my extra shoes and flip flops as well as my down jacket and rain jacket. My toiletries are packed in the Osprey Ultralight Zip organizer, and I also packed the Osprey Ultralight rain cover, just in case.. In the daypack I can fit my laptop, iPad, Osprey Powerhouse electronics accessory organizer with power cables and adapters, and my Nat Geo camera shoulder bag with Sony a7s camera and accessories.

The Farpoint 55 on the left, and the Farpoint 70 on the right. Both packed with the same stuff with a little room to spare. Hard to tell a difference.
The Farpoint 55 on the left, and the Farpoint 70 on the right. Both packed with the same stuff with a little room to spare. Hard to tell a difference.

In the Farpoint 55, I was able to fit everything I would need for an extended trip covering multiple climates and still had a little room to spare. Using the included straps, I compressed it all down and measured the bag: 25″ x 13″ x 10″(63cm x 33cm x 25cm). Next I packed everything into the Farpoint 70 and measured it: 25″ x 13″ x 10″(63cm x 33cm x 25cm). The same size. Since I didn’t have the Farpoint 55 stuffed to the gills, the Farpoint 70 also had plenty of room. The only fixed dimension is the height, due to the internal frame. That means if you don’t have the bags stuffed to the gills, you should be able to compress them both to the same size.

Measuring the Osprey Farpoint 55 (R) and the Farpoint 70 (L). When not stuffed, you can compress both packs to the same size, making it possible to potentially carryon the larger Farpoint 70.
Measuring the Osprey Farpoint 55 (left) and the Farpoint 70 (right). When not stuffed, you can compress both packs to the same size, making it possible to potentially carryon the larger Farpoint 70.

For me that is great, and exactly the kind of information I was hoping to find when I ordered both bags to compare. That means I can opt for the larger Farpoint 70 but still compress it down to a carry-on size while having some extra room just in case. Most people indicate they’ve never had a problem carrying on the Farpoint 55 even on some of the strictest budget airlines like Ryanair, so the same should be true of the Farpoint 70 when not stuffed. If I end up bringing back more souvenirs than expected, the extra capacity will come in handy, and I can check it if need be.

The Osprey Farpoint 55 (L) and the Osprey Farpoint 70 (R) next to each other..
The Osprey Farpoint 55 (left) and the Osprey Farpoint 70 (right) next to each other. You can see the Farpoint 70 isn’t as stretched out, offering you more potential room, but can be compressed to the same size as the Farpoint 55 if it’s not stuffed.

It should be noted, however, that it is very hard to find this extra 15L of space between the two bags. Again, we are talking one more inch in depth and width. That means really having to cram stuff into every nook and cranny of the bag to maximize space. Comparing to the Sojourn series, it’s very easy to spot the 20L difference when the 80L 28″ Sojourn is next to the 60L 25″ Sojourn, due to the reinforced walls of the Sojourns.

In conclusion, I’ve decided to go with the Farpoint 70. I like that the lightweight material means I can compress the bag down in size to something I should be able to carry on in most situations, while still having the ability to fit more stuff should the particular trip demand it, or if I pick some stuff up along the way. However, you might find the Farpoint 55 to be right for you, especially if you live by the maxim “If you have more space, you’ll pack more stuff.” For me, this isn’t necessarily true; I just like having the extra space for flexibility and for my bag to not feel crammed.

I hope this post helped clear up some questions you might have had about these great travel backpacks. If not, please comment below and I’d be glad to help any way I can! Or if you have questions about the Osprey Farpoint 40, check out Iylana’s post on why it’s perfect for petite-sized travelers.

FOLLOW UP: I took my Farpoint 70 on our three week trip to Turkey, Israel and Jordan and had no trouble carrying it onto planes. The only time I had to check it was flying Pegasus Airlines from Istanbul to Tel Aviv, due to it being overweight, not oversized (8kg limit). See the picture below, where the bag is able to fit inside United Airlines bag sizer for carryon luggage.

The Osprey Farpoint 70 was able to fit inside United Airlines bag checker with the daypack removed.

About The Author

In another life, I might have been a travel agent. I love scouring the internet for the best deals, putting together an itinerary, and seeing a trip come together. A good trip involves discovering new food and drink, with the right mix of art, history, and adventure.


  1. Thank gosh someone finally did this!!!
    I was struggling with the differences and I spotted a youtube video that kinda explained the differences in size but not NEARLY as exact and beautifully detailed. I just purchased the 70 version from moosejaw (moosejaw.com) as they are having a killer fall sale (20% off 1 item) for the 55v ($143) or clearance for the 70l version ($150). At that price point, I couldn’t argue with the little bit (literally inches) of extra space.

    Awesome clarification done here.
    I can now stop researching the hell outta this!!

  2. This was the comparison I was looking for! Thank you so much!

  3. This review gave me exactly what I was looking for – thanks so much!

  4. very helpful info as my hubby & i couldnt decide
    Was yours the S/M or the larger? The website shows the 50L & 70L break down into two others sizes

    • Hi Sandra, I got the M/L, as I am 6’1″. The S/M size is for around 5’7″ or so and under. Iylana is 5’2″ and the S/M fit her well.

      • The sizing is based on torso length. Your height has very little to do with it. When your torso length is around 18, you can pretty much fit either one. When it’s longer, you have to start looking into M/L for the correct back support and waist strap location.
        This generalization may not help(there are always exceptions in body types), but a caucasian women would probably need to be over 6’3″ to have a torso that long while caucasian male might just need 6’1 or 6’2″. Asian men, on the other hand might need a M/L at 5’10”?
        The only sure thing is to measure torso length. Get it done right will save you some back pain:)
        Of course, if you are 5’2″ my money is on not having 18+” torso even if you have super short legs!

  5. Thank you so much this is exactly what i needed!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. Thank you! This is exactly the kind of detail I was looking for when deciding between the 55 and the 70 🙂 Decided to go for the 70 even though it’s only a tiny increase in space because we’re going traveling for so long, and it can be packed down if we aren’t utilizing every Litre of space.

  7. Thanks for the review! Amazon has the occasional sale for the Farpoint 70 at $120. Is this a good deal?

  8. Were you able to carry it on Ryan Air as a carry-on? Even the Osprey Farpoint 50’s dimensions are too big. Have you traveled on Ryan Air with your Farpoint 70. It’s my first backpacking trip and I still choosing which backpack to buy.

    • I personally haven’t used it on Ryan Air, but I have read stories where people have been able to. Probably just depends on who is working the counter that day and if they overlook it.

  9. This is what i totally needed! have been researching to find out the difference.

  10. Thaks for the review! Your review was exactly what I was looking for; looks like a lot of people had the same question, but only you gave the answer :D. Cheers from Uruguay.

  11. Hi Shane,

    Thank you very much from France for your review.
    I was looking for a RTW trip rucksack and my choice went to Osprey.
    Your review is the one I’ve been looking for a long time to get a final choice.
    Like Johnny, and for the same reasons, I ordered the 70; which seems to be a little bit more convenient.

    Thanks again.

  12. What color are those backpacks? Jasper Red?

  13. The Farpoint s companion pack is the best little pack of any in the review with a small hip belt and sternum strap. This pack is decked out with all the little features you d need in a small daypack.

  14. Thanks for the blog. It got me thinking and I realized Farpoint 70 is actually easier to get on board a plane than a farpoint 55 with the same amount of clothing inside. Since budget airlines have smaller and different dimension requirements, with a little room to manipulate the backpack helps you squeeze it into the guide box!
    I will also have the option of paying the blood sucking airline if I decide to buy more stuff abroad. At least I have that choice without getting a 3rd bag….which may complicate things.

  15. AH Mazing report! This is super helpful , I have been searching for the right bag after I quickly purchased my first one without any research and realized i probably shouldn’t have bought the one I did, AND the store went out of business and now i’m stuck with it! (its a great bag, however not ideal for trips longer than 10 days even if you are the lightest packer in the world…..its the Osprey Sirus 35 which the people at the store ((that is now out of business…i wonder why?)) did not inform me was not exactly a travel bag but was a hiking bag) Note to self….do more research! However, when I come across a post like this it really is all the research I need. I’ve been looking at this bag and wondering if the 70L was too big to carry on and this, as I said earlier was SUPER helpful! Gracias! 🙂

  16. Ah, I might…thats not a bad idea, although it is good for actual trekking or for short trips…i used it for india for 10 days and it was great. until i bought more souvenirs than anticipated…..the guy convinced me that the bigger one might not fit in the carry on situation if i packed it too full….it was bad advice all around! live and learn 🙂

  17. Thank you so much for your review!!
    I was condused to choose between 55L and 70L, but only you give the answer that I’m looking for.

    Cheers from Malaysia (^-^)

  18. Fantastic review, exactly what I needed, thanks guys!

  19. great review and comparison!

    I am debating between the two bags myself with the idea of using one as a carry-on. This review has been highly informative.

    I just wanted to point out that both the 55L and the 70L options come in two sizes (S/M or M/L).

    Comparing a 55 L M/L to a 70L S/M sized bag shows that they are very similar in their dimensions with the 70L being a lot deeper (at least by my eye when I checked yesterday at a local store).

    Comparing the 55L M/L and a 70L M/L bags there is an obvious difference in size. The M/L 70L bag is an extra inch in all three dimensions (26H X 14W X 13D IN) vs the M/L 55L bag (25H X 13W X 12D IN).

    For reference from Osprey website as of 7/26/2016:

    55L S/M 24H X 13W X 12D IN
    55L M/L 25H X 13W X 12D IN
    70L S/M 24H X 13W X 13D IN
    70L M/L 26H X 14W X 13D IN

    The 70L M/L seemed a bit too large for carry-on in the store but I suppose if it isn’t stuffed fully it can be stuffed down?

    • Thanks for your comment!

      Again, your mileage may vary on being able to check the 70L Farpoint, or even the 55L for that matter. The vertical dimension can’t be compressed any because of the internal frame. Its 25″ or 26″ which is longer than legal carryon size. However most airlines aren’t going to pull out their tape measure to verify. Perhaps some of the stricter budget airlines will. The only time I’ve had to check it was because it was overweight, not oversized. Hope that helps!

    • Also the S/M and M/L are for different torso sizes, so be sure whichever one you’re getting fits your frame! Don’t get the smaller one to save an inch and then it doesn’t properly fit your body.

      • thanks i believe my torso is in range for both but i plan on going to my local REI to have them fit me properly before making a final purchase. Just booked my 3 week trip to SIngapore, Malaysia and Thailand so will be purchasing a bag in the next couple months!

  20. Briliant post! Thank you so much.

  21. This is exactly what I needed…a really good, detailed comparison between the two. Thank you.

  22. How well did the farpoint 70 m/l fit into the overhead bins on your flight? I plan to go to thailand in Nov and already have purchased an 2016 farpoint 70 m/l which will be 26″ long. I am worried about that extra inch not being able to shut the overhead bin. Was there extra room for your guys bags?

    • Hi Julien. I’ve never had a problem fitting it in the overhead bins, especially on larger transcontinental flights. Recently just took it aboard a smaller Embraer aircraft and it still fit with no problem!

  23. […] than travel bloggers? After reading so much about the Osprey Farpoint from Goats on the Road, Penny Caravan and seeing it top the list for Best Backpacks on The Wire Cutter, I knew I could be on to a […]

  24. Thank you for this great article. It really help me to decide. Happy travelling.

  25. I’m confused as to how either of these bags fit the required luggage allowance — even the fp55. I’m flying Cathay Pacific in a few weeks and their website says that the bags must be 56cm x 36cm x 23cm (22in x 14in x 9in)— which is bigger than the international guidelines. Am I misunderstanding something? Thank you!

    • Hello! Thank you for your question. Yes, the bag is technically larger than maximum “legal” carryon size, but in practice this generally shouldn’t be a problem, unless the attendants are very strict and pull out a tape measure. In several trips I have never had to check the bag due to its size, only once due to it being overweight. And I’ve read plenty of reports of others carrying it on as well, even on strict budget airlines. Hope this helps!

  26. Amazing reveiw. Exactly what I needed to know. Huge help. Went with the 70L, can’t wait to use it for my next trip!

  27. This was a huge help! Thanks so much for writing this article. I spent a whole day watching videos, searching for articles about the Farpoint… this was by far one of the very few that helped! It especially helped when it came down to my severe indecisiveness regarding whether to go with the 55 or 70! It was driving me nuts! I ended up going with the 70 🙂

  28. Thank you SOOOO much for this!! Exactly what I was looking for!!

  29. thanks for the review.

  30. Greatly informative review, thanks. Can you tell me the dimensions of the daypack? Other than in terms of litres I can’t find any online details.I’m off to India and at one point will be travelling away from base using the daypack only – for about a week. I wonder how the daypack measures up to the small bag I’ve used for such circumstances before. Unfortunately I don’t know its quoted litreage so wanted to compare on stated dimensions. Thanks.

    • Hi Dan, glad the review helped. I plan on doing an in depth review of the backpack itself besides the comparison between the two sizes and hopefully answer any other questions people have. Regarding the size of the daypack I measure it as 16″ x 10″ x 4″ (40cm x 25cm x 10cm). I’d say a week’s worth of clothes in the daypack would be very hard to manage, but you might be able to squeeze 2-3 days worth in if you pack light and wash.

  31. Thanks a lot, great comparison!! Very useful!

  32. I bought my Farpoint 70 back in 2013 and I am very happy with it. Back then I tried to gather this kind of info before buying it but I couldn’t find anything about it so I decided to go with the 70L because I thought about leaving the extra space between the 55 and 70 for souvenirs.

    Thanks for your review, I will be sharing this info to my friends.

  33. thanks for the thorough review! bought the 70litre version and worried it mightbe too big! your review gave me the peace of mind!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>